Step 3 · Decide
Compare design options
Three genuinely different experiences are assessed using the same transparent criteria. The recommendation is clear, but the lecturer makes the final decision.
AI recommendedBest fit
Microbe Outbreak Investigation
Teams diagnose a simulated outbreak using evidence cards and propose a response plan.
94/100
Highest overall score96Alignment
91Engagement
96Feasibility
Option 2Simulation
Microbe Marketplace
Teams trade characteristics and build the strongest case for identifying unknown organisms.
86/100
Strong agency88Alignment
93Engagement
78Feasibility
Option 3Puzzle
Pathogen Escape Room
Teams unlock a chain of organism-identification puzzles against a countdown.
83/100
High excitement84Alignment
96Engagement
69Feasibility
Evidence-based comparison
Why the recommended option is stronger for this exact brief
| Criterion | Outbreak investigation | Marketplace | Escape room |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-world relevance | ✓ Direct outbreak scenario | Moderate | Indirect puzzle context |
| Bloom target | ✓ Analyse + evaluate | Apply + analyse | Apply + analyse |
| Student evidence | ✓ Conclusion + response plan | Classification case | Puzzle completion |
| Setup burden | Low | Medium | High |
| Accessibility | ✓ Multimodal and low pressure | Fast trading may disadvantage some | Countdown may create barriers |
| Lecturer readiness | Recommended | Needs facilitation adaptation | Needs additional testing |
Lecturer decision
Selected option
Selected
Microbe Outbreak Investigation
Strongest balance of authentic problem-solving, cognitive depth and classroom feasibility.
Human control point
The AI recommendation is advisory. The lecturer can select another option, edit the brief or request a new set.